Notes on the Catechism, Part 3
Notes on Fr. Plant’s King Oswald’s Heirs:
Meditations on the Catechism of the English Church,
3rd Session, Chapters 22 – 40, November 12th, 2026
Intro: Fr. Plant’s book begins and ends with the image of trees, Oswald’s tree and its association with trees in other traditions, but primarily in the Scriptures with the Cross of Christ in the New Testament and the Trees of Life and Knowledge in Genesis. In a way the whole biblical story, he seems to suggest, is captured in the symbolism of trees. I want to begin our ending of his treatment of the Catechism with some tree references found in George Herbert’s poems which, I think complement Fr. Plant’s splendid and helpful reflections. The second stanza of Herbert’s poem “Easter” comes to mind.
Awake, my lute, and struggle for thy part
With all thy art
The crosse taught all wood to resound his name,
Who bore the same.
His wretched sinews taught all strings, what key
Is best to celebrate this most high day.
Then in his poem “The Crosse”, he speaks of it as “this strange and uncouth thing … to make me sigh, and seek, and faint and die, / until I had some place , where I might sing, / And serve thee. “ Somehow we have to learn how to hold these different moments together, the things of suffering and the things of joy.
Chapter 22: My Heart At Liberty. This chapter considers God’s Commandments but from the consideration of law as freedom and not as coercion to arbitrary and random demands. He does not, however, take us through the (so-called – they aren’t exactly numbered) ten commandments but alludes to them as “the shape of reality itself”. They belong to our freedom, our being freed to the law which details the essential features of our relation to God himself and through God to our lives with one another; in short, love of God and Neighbour are inseparable and are a strong affirmation of life and truth. This can be complemented by seeing the Commandments not as a list – hence something arbitrary and disconnected – but as comprehensive, interdependent, and complete. Because God is God, we might say, everything else follows in an orderly fashion. The Ten Commandments, for example, are themselves an expression of natural law or reason here given authoritatively by God. But it is not simply that they are commanded by God, the quis of ‘who said’ but rather the quid, reflection on what is said. This is crucial and important; in short, their content and orderly interrelationship belongs to the relation between intellect and will in God, and in us. The false separation of intellect and will is a constant theme in Fr. Plant’s argument.
Charles Simeon served as vicar of
O Lord our God, whose name only is excellent and thy praise above heaven and earth: We give thee high praise and hearty thanks for all those who counted not their lives dear unto themselves but laid them down for their friends; beseeching thee to give them a part and a lot in those good things which thou has prepared for all those whose names are written in the Book of Life; and grant to us, that having them always in remembrance, we may imitate their faithfulness and with them inherit the new name which thou has promised to them that overcome; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
