KES Chapel Reflection, Week of 3 September
In the beginning God … In the beginning was the Word
The tradition of our first two Chapel services at the beginning of term is for the head boy and head girl to read two short Scripture lessons: one from Genesis (Gen. 1.1-5) and the other from The Gospel according to St. John (John 1.1-5). They are powerful and significant readings about which it is not too much of an exaggeration to say that the Chapel would not be able to contain all of the books that comment upon, reflect, and allude to these two passages, books that embrace a large range of cultures and intellectual disciplines over a vast array of ages.
How to think about the beginning of term? In Chapel it is about recalling how there is a beginning for all of us because there is something there before us, a beginning that is ultimately about the principles of education that guide and direct the School. Begin with God, the beginning without beginning, and everything else comes after, especially the things that belong to our intellectual and spiritual life and which inform all our other doings. Chapel is an integral part of the School and speaks to the idea of the whole School and to the wholeness of individuals.
The two readings in concert are enormously influential and central to a large number of discourses both within and between different cultures and religions. The idea of creation and of the Creator as an intellectual principle is common to Jewish, Christian and Islamic thought, for instance, and all three in a creative relation to Greek philosophy. ‘He speaks and it is,’ as the Qur’an suggests, showing how it is influenced by both texts. The continuing engagement between these texts and the works of Plato and Aristotle all contribute to the idea of the cosmos as intelligible and to the rich tradition of ethical and philosophical reflection on how we think nature and ultimately ourselves.
These two passages also belong to the early modern developments in natural philosophy, even to the works of Newton and Darwin, and to all manner of subsequent debates. They have their counterparts, too, in the works of Hinduism and Buddhism, Confucianism and Daoism. They belong to our constant reflection on what it means to think the natural world; in short, to think the world as being thinkable.