Sermon for the First Sunday in Lent
Receive not the grace of God in vain
There can be no greater vanity in all senses of the word than the yielding to temptation. It is both empty nothingness and narcissistic self-absorption. It is not by accident that the First Sunday in Lent begins with the story of the temptations of Christ. We ignore it at our peril because it speaks so directly to our hearts and minds and presents a pressing (and depressing) dilemma and challenge. Temptations ‘r us, to be sure, but the point so often missed is that temptation is really about our relation to the good. The story reveals our temptations. Christ is tempted for us and for our learning about the nature of temptation and its overcoming. Thus, temptation has altogether to do with a necessary testing of our wills in order to bring out the truth of our willing and our knowing, namely, that upon which they depend.
The Gospel shows us the making known of the essential forms of temptation and their overcoming. With respect to such forms, we confront a fairly sophisticated understanding of temptation that is far deeper and wiser than what our therapeutic culture offers, only because the latter is so divorced from the moral and ethical traditions to which this story belongs. We have here an order of temptation and a making known of the constitutive elements of our humanity. To put it bluntly, what is revealed negatively through the temptations is the positive form of our relation to the goodness of God. We are tempted in certain ways and they all reveal that to which we so easily succumb. Such is our weakness in contrast to the strength of Christ who is “tempted yet undefiled,” quite unlike us. He is tempted for our sake, for our learning and living, we might say. The Gospel shows us the overcoming of temptation not by us alone but, as the Epistle suggests, by our working with the order of grace.
Nothing could be more counter-culture. Why? Because our culture defines you by your temptations and says that is what you are. It means being defined by a negative. Such is the culture of addiction, of dependence and co-dependence, of this diagnosis and that. There are, of course, certain conditions and diagnoses that are part of human experience. But is that what fundamentally defines what it means to be human? Are you the diagnosis, the condition, the disease? Once you assume the medicalization of society and human behaviour, then there is really no temptation; there is only the collapse and capitulation to a deterministic way of thinking that denies accountability and agency. There is no temptation, only determinism. You are determined and defined but at the expense of personality and agency, at the expense of your humanity.
