Author: CCW

“And we beheld his glory”

We beheld. Yet we can only behold what we are given to see. What we are given to see is something made. It is not the Word but “the Word made flesh”. The shepherds say “Let us now go even unto Bethlehem and see this thing which is come to pass,” literally, this saying that has happened, this Word that is made flesh. For God is the poet of Christmas night. In Greek, the poet is maker.

The poet makes and makes known. We can only see “this thing which is come to pass,” because “the Lord hath [it] made known unto us.” We can only see in the light of God himself. Where God is, there will his light be also. By the light of God we are caught up into a greater understanding. We are born anew “not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God;” born from above into the company of the one whom we behold now with us. His light perfects our light.

For by our own lights, we see but do not see. Our light is darkness. “He came unto his own and his own received him not.” Our seeing is often without a beholding, without an embracing in faith and understanding what we are given to see; it is without a receiving. But by this greater light – the light of God’s Word – our light is taken up into something more. We are received into what we receive. “We beheld his glory”. The greater light is the light of grace, the grace to behold “the Word made flesh.”

What do we behold? It is almost as an after-thought that we are told in parenthesis that “we beheld the glory as of the only-begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.” We behold the glory of the Word and Son of the Father who is Light and Life. As the 2nd century theologian Irenaeus says, “the glory of God is man alive,” but only because “the life of our humanity is the vision of God.”

Word, Light and Son. These are the three great images which belong personally and essentially to Jesus Christ. They are the trinity of his essential divinity, as it were, without which all our celebrations are really nothing but our vain pretensions and protestations against the dying of the light – our light, our dying.

Yet, here is something more without which we are ever less than ourselves, less than what we ourselves would be, less than who we are in God’s sight. Here is God’s Word now with us. Here is God’s Light now illuminating our understanding. Here is God’s Son now become God’s Son for us and with us. For “unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given.” Not that we may possess him and keep him for ourselves, salvation cannot be so selfish, but rather that he might possess us and keep us with himself. He gives himself to all that all might receive him. Such is the divine mystery of love that Christmas makes known to us. Word, Light and Son are the essentials of love.

(more…)

Print this entry

“Who art thou?”

The questions reverberate with great intensity in today’s Gospel. “Who are thou?” If not the Christ, then “Art thou Elijah?” If not Elijah, then “Art thou the Prophet?” If not the Prophet, then “Who art thou? that we may give an answer to them that sent us. What sayest thou of thyself?” Only then do we learn what Jesus told us last Sunday about John the Baptist as “more than a prophet”. He says of himself “I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness. Make straight the way of the Lord, as said the prophet Isaiah.” Ego vox clamantis in deserto. This in turn leads to the last question. “And Why baptizest thou then, if thou be not the Christ, nor Elijah, nor the Prophet?”

This parade of questions might seem to correspond to our contemporary obsessions about personal identity. Rather it counters and corrects such tendencies. The whole scene is known as “the record” or “the witness of John,” meaning John the Baptist. It complements wonderfully the Epistle reading from Philippians that “the Lord is at hand.” And wonderfully so since this day, the Fourth Sunday in Advent, is also Christmas Eve. Both the readings and this day itself bring us to Christ in the meaning of his coming to us.

The questions of the “Priests and Levites from Jerusalem”, later identified as Pharisees, point us to a deeper understanding of what it means to be human, namely, the desire to know. They show us that universal quest for knowledge, for meaning and understanding, not information. In a way, they anticipate and are like the “Magi from Anatolia,” seekers all. They are from Jerusalem, not in Jerusalem. They have come into the wilderness of “Bethany beyond Jordan” in the quest to know who John the Baptist is. The Christ, Elijah, the Prophet? “Who art thou?” The passage comes immediately after the Prologue of John’s Gospel, part of which is read at Christmas Eve. It focuses on the ministry of John the Baptist who prepares for the coming of Christ in us.

How? What is John’s ministry? Mark tells us concisely just after quoting this same passage from Isaiah that “John the baptizer appeared in the wilderness, preaching a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins.” But the baptism of John with water through the confession of sin is not the forgiveness of sins. Yet it signals the profound desire for forgiveness, a metanoia, a change in outlook and understanding in us. In other words, it highlights our desire for something more, for wholeness and truth. Thus, John the Baptist points us to Jesus. That is the point of this Gospel. As John the Baptist explains, “I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not: he it is who cometh after me, whose shoe’s latchet I am not worthy to unloose.” And the very next day (as it will be literally for us}, “John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.”

(more…)

Print this entry

My Lord and My God

And is it true? And is it true,
This most tremendous tale of all,
Seen in a stained-glass window’s hue,
A Baby in an ox’s stall?
The Maker of the stars and sea
Become a Child on earth for me?

And is it true? For if it is,
No loving fingers tying strings
Around those tissued fripperies,
The sweet and silly Christmas things,
Bath salts and inexpensive scent
And hideous tie so kindly meant,

No love that in a family dwells,
No carolling in frosty air,
Nor all the steeple-shaking bells
Can with this single Truth compare –
That God was man in Palestine
And lives today in Bread and Wine.

These are the last three verses from John Betjeman’s poem, “Christmas”.

Thomas is the Advent Saint who brings us to the mystery of Christmas. John Betjeman’s poem captures perfectly the underlying impulse of Thomas’ so-called doubting; it is really a kind of questioning and, as such, in pursuit of understanding. A Resurrection story, it recalls the appearance of Christ to the disciples who were huddled in fear behind closed doors on the evening of Easter Day. Thomas was not present with them. When he hears their report that “ we have seen the Lord,” he famously says, “except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails, and thrust my hand into his side, I will not believe.”

The Feast of St. Thomas falls just before the festival of Christ’s Nativity. The Resurrection and the Nativity are completely intertwined and it is the same question, a question about the reality of Christ’s embrace of our humanity, soul and body, that belongs to the radical truth of the Incarnation. Thomas’ question helps us to think about its radical meaning. The birth and passion of Christ reveal to us both the nature of God and a fuller view of our humanity. In a way, Thomas’ question is about the reality of Christ’s humanity and in turn his divinity.

(more…)

Print this entry

“What went ye out into the wilderness to see?”

The questions of Advent reach a crescendo of intensity on the last two Sundays of Advent. They begin today with John’s great question to Jesus: “Art thou he that should come or do we look for another?” That, in turn, leads to the rhetorical questions of Jesus to the multitude in the wilderness about John. “What went ye out into the wilderness to see?” Jesus asks, with triple intensity. “What went ye out for to see?” “But what went ye out for to see?” In a wonderful paradox, Jesus’ questions to us point us to John who in turn points us to Jesus. Likewise, next Sunday the questions about John the Baptist by the “Priests and Levites from Jerusalem” lead to John the Baptist’s proclamation in “Bethany beyond Jordan” about Jesus as “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.”

What are these advent questions really about? They awaken us to the redemption of our desires by placing our desires, what I am tempted to call the ‘bad infinity of our desires’ (schlechte unendlichkeit – with apologies to Hegel), with God in Christ . Such is the redemption of our desires. Our desires belong to prayer in the sense of longing but our longing itself is essentially tragic because it is a longing for what we do not have and cannot attain. It is a desire for this thing and that thing in an effort to find the truth of our desires which is always beyond us. Dante captures this sense of the endless restlessness of desire in the Convivio:

the infant intensely longing for an apple; and then, later on, for a little bird; and then, still further on, fine clothes; and then a horse; and then a mistress; then modest riches; then more; and then still more. And that is because in none of these things does it find that for which it ever seeks, and it believes to find it further on.

It belongs to human desire, as he puts it, to be always reaching out in one way or another. “And the reason is this: the deepest desire of each thing, arising from its very nature, is to return to its principle. And because God is the principle of our soul, and has made it like himself (as it is written, ‘Let us make man in our image and likeness’), the soul mightily desires to return to him;” in short, to God. Prayer, as George Herbert wonderfully says, is “God’s breath in man returning to his birth,” essentially encapsulating the same understanding.

All this is profoundly beautiful and true and yet it is both forgotten and denied in our contemporary world. Radically incomplete and reductive forms of thinking such as psychology, economics, and the social sciences, collectively captured in the term ‘sociologism’, displace theology and philosophy as the primary forms of thought. We have lost a sense of God and our humanity in their intrinsic and necessary interrelation. This leads to the reduction of all authority to “mere power detached from any intrinsic ordination to truth and goodness”. As the Italian philosopher and statesman, Augusto Del Noce observes, sociologism effectively “reduces all conceptions of the world to ideologies, expressions of the historical-social situation of some groups, as spiritual superstructures or forces that are not spiritual at all, such as class interests, unconscious collective motivations, and concrete circumstances of social life”. Reducing all conceptions of the world to a kind of ‘social constructivism’ not only negates the transcendence of God and the givenness of creation but also itself since all human and social constructions depend upon principles prior to themselves. It is as if we are gods, making the world and God in our own image.

(more…)

Print this entry