Day: September 4, 2022

“Ephphatha, that is, Be opened”

It is one of a handful of ‘aramaisms’ in the New Testament, words in Aramaic, a northern semitic dialect used in Syria which became the lingua franca throughout the Near East, and thus common within the Hebrew world, too. In Mark’s Gospel the Greek translation of the Aramaic word is always provided, as it is here. “Ephphatha, that is, Be opened.”

What does it mean to be opened? The literal sense is obvious, it seems, in terms of the healing by Jesus of “one that was deaf and had an impediment in his speech.” His ears are opened to hear and his tongue loosened so that he can speak. Remarkable enough, but is that all there is to it? What does it say to us? “The letter killeth,” after all, as Paul reminds us, “but the spirit giveth life.”

Yet isn’t that really what the healing miracle is all about? “He hath done all things well; he maketh both the deaf to hear, and the dumb to speak.” “The spirit giveth life.” Intellectual and spiritual life is conveyed through physical and sacramental means. In other words, in Christ we are opened out to life in its fullness, life with God. “Our sufficiency is from God” and not “of ourselves.” The real miracle is life. God is essential life. Being opened here is about the “trust we have through Christ to Godward”; the opening is the orientation of our lives towards truth and life and light, to what is more than ourselves. It is not about trusting in ourselves for that is to be closed in upon ourselves in our current obsessions about the self and self-image.

This is largely negative because in the culture of outrage and antagonism the self is constructed in contrast to what is other than self in ways that are oppositional. The pronoun wars reveal the inherent ambiguity of third person pronouns which run the risk of turning one another into an object for others and even for oneself thus negating the self as subject. The same thing can be observed with the digital phenomenon of ‘selfies’. A ‘selfie’ is not you; it is only an image, partial and incomplete, a construct of you and sometimes curated by you. Yet you are more than your ‘selfie’ which becomes merely a projection of your self-image of how you want others to see you or, worse, how others want to persuade you about yourself; i.e. manipulate you. This is the toxicity of the social media world which reflects a sense of antagonism towards the world which is seen as fearful and threatening and in turn projects that sense of antagonism onto others. Things go viral in the social media world just like infectious diseases in the material world. Such is the madness of crowds.

(more…)

Print this entry